lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank cpufreq
> The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
> just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.

Ah, right. How did I forget about that nice piece?

> I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
> call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a
> regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
> hit when trying to make a general solution.

So, how is your "reentrancy in the common clk framework" series[1]
going on? Haven't seen any update since August.

Shawn

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/182198



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-29 03:21    [W:0.180 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site