lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6 v6] cpufreq, highbank: add support for highbank cpufreq
Date
Quoting Shawn Guo (2012-11-28 07:17:44)
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:58:02PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:16:12AM -0600, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> > > I'd
> > > have to move most of the logic of hb_set_target() into
> > > clk_highbank.c:clk_pll_set_rate() and then add extra logic for when
> > > cpufreq is not enabled/loaded.
> >
> > You only need to move hb_voltage_change() into cpu clock's .set_rate()
> > hook with no need of checking if cpufreq is enabled or not.
> >
> Need to also check whether frequency or voltage should be changed first
> in .set_rate() though.
>
> Shawn
>

The notifiers in the clk framework might be a better place for this than
just simply hacking the logic into the .set_rate callback.

I haven't looked at the definition of hb_voltage_change but does the
call graph make any clk api calls? Are you talking over i2c to a
regulator? If so then you'll probably hit the same reentrancy problem I
hit when trying to make a general solution.

Regards,
Mike

>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-28 17:41    [W:0.176 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site