Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:43:20 +0900 | From | Yasuaki Ishimatsu <> | Subject | Re: [Patch v4 00/12] memory-hotplug: hot-remove physical memory |
| |
Hi Andrew,
2012/11/28 4:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:00:10 +0800 > Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> The patch-set was divided from following thread's patch-set. >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/5/201 >> >> The last version of this patchset: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/93 > > As we're now at -rc7 I'd prefer to take a look at all of this after the > 3.7 release - please resend everything shortly after 3.8-rc1.
Almost patches about memory hotplug has been merged into your and Rafael's tree. And these patches are waiting to open the v3.8 merge window. Remaining patches are only this patch-set. So we hope that this patch-set is merged into v3.8.
In merging this patch-set into v3.8, Linux on x86_64 makes a memory hot plug possible.
Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> >> If you want to know the reason, please read following thread. >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/83 > > Please include the rationale within each version of the patchset rather > than by linking to an old email. Because > > a) this way, more people are likely to read it > > b) it permits the text to be maimtained as the code evolves > > c) it permits the text to be included in the mainlnie commit, where > people can find it. > >> The patch-set has only the function of kernel core side for physical >> memory hot remove. So if you use the patch, please apply following >> patches. >> >> - bug fix for memory hot remove >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/31/269 >> >> - acpi framework >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/26/175 > > What's happening with the acpi framework? has it received any feedback > from the ACPI developers? >
| |