lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] fs: configfs: programmatically create config groups
Date
On Mon, Nov 26 2012, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Wouldn't say that. It may adds complexity on another level. The target
> subsystem has the same problem with adding luns and there seems nothing
> wrong with having lun3 and 4 and leaving 0 and 1 unsued.

That's not what Wikipedia claims though (from
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_Unit_Number>):

LUN 0: There is one LUN which is required to exist in every
target: zero. The logical unit with LUN zero is special in that
it must implement a few specific commands, most notably Report
LUNs, which is how an initiator can find out all the other LUNs
in the target. But LUN zero need not provide any other services,
such as a storage volume.

That's why I proposed solution where one needs to have continuous
numbering of LUNs. I'm not an expert on SCSI though.

> With the tcm gadget I get:
>
> |scsi 0:0:0:2: Direct-Access LIO-ORG RAMDISK-MCP 4.0 PQ: 0
> ANSI: 5
> |scsi 0:0:0:3: Direct-Access LIO-ORG FILEIO 4.0 PQ: 0
> ANSI: 5
>
> You notice :2 and :3 instead :0 and :1. While should be there something
> wrong with this?

It may be that it works on Linux but fails on some other systems (or
even older Linux kernels). Like I've said, I'm not SCSI expert, so my
knowledge of it is (embarrassingly) minimal.

--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@google.com>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-26 20:01    [W:0.069 / U:1.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site