Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 24 Nov 2012 11:41:23 +0200 | Subject | Re: [patch 6/8] kcmp selftests: build fix | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 10:29 AM, <dyoung@redhat.com> wrote: > For old glibc there's no the syscall number this tests will cause > make run_tests fail. > Add a macro to define the number. This should be ok because it will be > built in latest kernel source. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > --- linux-2.6.orig/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c 2012-11-23 22:37:04.789058192 +0800 > +++ linux-2.6/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c 2012-11-23 22:38:43.195191747 +0800 > @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ > #include <sys/stat.h> > #include <sys/wait.h> > > +#ifndef __NR_kcmp > +#define __NR_kcmp 272 > +#endif
Is the syscall number really going to be the same across all architectures?
> static long sys_kcmp(int pid1, int pid2, int type, int fd1, int fd2) > { > return syscall(__NR_kcmp, pid1, pid2, type, fd1, fd2); > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |