Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add Calxeda SOC idle support | Date | Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:32:46 +0100 |
| |
On Saturday, November 24, 2012 03:21:49 PM Olof Johansson wrote: > Rafael, > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > On Monday, November 12, 2012 10:00:07 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Wednesday 07 November 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > >> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> > >> > > >> > Add support for core powergating on Calxeda platforms. Initially, this > >> > supports ECX-1000 (highbank), but support will be added for ECX-2000 > >> > later. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> > >> > Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> > >> > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> > >> > >> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> > >> > It's not really clear where we want ARM cpuidle drivers. We're moving > >> > everything else out of arch/arm, and my understanding is Len doesn't want > >> > them in drivers/idle. It seems kind of silly to me to have the framework > >> > and drivers in 2 places. I've put this in drivers/cpuidle, but it doesn't > >> > make any difference to me. > >> > >> Fine with me. I just don't want in in arch/arm because I'm guessing this will > >> be shared with arm64, which in turn shares idle (and other) drivers with various > >> powerpc, mips and x86 socs. > > > > Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next as v3.8 material. > > We already have it in arm-soc. Since there's no maintainer listed for > the directory, it didn't seem like there were any better merge paths.
Cool, I'll drop it then.
Thanks, Rafael
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |