lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Recent kernel "mount" slow


On Sat, 24 Nov 2012, Jeff Chua wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
> > On 2012-11-22 20:21, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >> Doesn't sound like a fsdevel issue since it seems to be independent of
> >> filesystems. More like some generic block layer thing. Adding Jens
> >> (and quoting the whole thing)
> >>
> >> Jens, any ideas? Most of your stuff came in after -rc2, which would
> >> fit with the fact that most of the slowdown seems to be after -rc2
> >> according to Jeff.
> >
> > No ideas. Looking at what went in from my side, only the rq plug sorting
> > is a core change, and that should not cause any change in behaviour for
> > a single device. That's commit 975927b9.
> >
> >> Jeff, more bisecting would be good, though.
> >
> > Probably required, yes...
>
>
> This one slows mount from 0.012s to 0.168s.
>
> commit 62ac665ff9fc07497ca524bd20d6a96893d11071
> Author: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed Sep 26 07:46:43 2012 +0200
>
> blockdev: turn a rw semaphore into a percpu rw semaphore
>
>
> There were couple of more changes to percpu-rw-semaphores after
> 3.7.0-rc2 and those slows mount further from 0.168s to 0.500s. I don't
> really know, but I'm suspecting these. Still bisecting.

The problem there is that you either use normal semaphores and slow down
I/O or you use percpu-semaphores, you don't slow down I/O, but you slow
down mount.

So it's better to slow down mount.

(if you don't use any semaphore at all, as it was in 3.6 kernel and
before, there is a race condition that can crash the kernel if someone
does mount and direct I/O read on the same device at the same time)

You can improve mount time if you change all occurences of
synchronize_sched() in include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h to
synchronize_sched_expedited().

But some people say that synchronize_sched_expedited() is bad for real
time latency. (can there be something like: if (realtime)
synchronize_sched(); else synchronize_sched_expedited(); ?)

Mikulas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-24 22:41    [W:0.194 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site