lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RESENDING] [PATCH 07/22] ASoC: Ux500: Initialise PCM from MSP probe rather than as a device
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > > > > Can we have some closure on this patch please, as it's blocking the
> > > > > patch-set? I'm fairly sure the patch is doing the correct thing, as
> > > > > seconded by Mark.
>
> > > > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We have
> > > > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2S-block is
> > > > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at the same time.
> > > > Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the
> > > > platform_name instead?
>
> > > There are other drivers which do this already.
>
> > > I don't think it's an issue to do this.
>
> > Has anyone had any more bright ideas on how we might handle this?
>
> > The device is still being handled in platform code and I'm desperate
> > to get it out of there.
>
> Why do we need any ideas? Just implement it already.

How do you mean? I've written the patch, just accept it. ;)

--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-23 11:02    [W:0.110 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site