| Date | Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:03:06 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/46] Automatic NUMA Balancing V4 |
| |
* Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:21:06AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > I am not including a benchmark report in this but will be posting one > > shortly in the "Latest numa/core release, v16" thread along with the latest > > schednuma figures I have available. > > > > Report is linked here https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/21/202 > > I ended up cancelling the remaining tests and restarted with > > 1. schednuma + patches posted since so that works out as
Mel, I'd like to ask you to refer to our tree as numa/core or 'numacore' in the future. Would such a courtesy to use the current name of our tree be possible?
(We dropped sched/numa long ago and that you still keep referring to it is rather confusing to me.)
Thanks!
Ingo
|