Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Nov 2012 10:45:14 +0100 | From | Paolo Valente <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: QFQ Plus: fair-queueing service at DRR cost |
| |
Il 20/11/2012 19:54, David Miller ha scritto: > From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@unimore.it> > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 18:45:13 +0100 > >> - struct sk_buff *skb; >> + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; > > This is not really an improvement, Sorry for trying this silly short cut now the compiler can think > that NULL is passed eventually into qdisc_bstats_update(). > > Please make the logic easier for the compiler to digest. > > For example, restructure the top-level logic into something like: > > skb = NULL; > if (!list_empty(&in_serv_agg->active)) > skb = qfq_peek_skb(in_serv_agg, &cl, &len); > else > len = 0; /* no more active classes in the in-service agg */ > > if (len == 0 || in_serv_agg->budget < len) { > ... > /* > * If we get here, there are other aggregates queued: > * choose the new aggregate to serve. > */ > in_serv_agg = q->in_serv_agg = qfq_choose_next_agg(q); > skb = qfq_peek_skb(in_serv_agg, &cl, &len); > } > if (!skb) > return NULL; > > That way it is clearer, to both humans and the compiler, what is > going on here. > Got it. Actually, if the first qfq_peek_skb returns NULL, then the example version that you are proposing apparently may behave in a different way than the original one: in your proposal the scheduler tries to switch to a new aggregate and may return a non-NULL value, whereas the original version would immediately return NULL. I guess that this slightly different behavior is fine as well, and I am preparing a new patch that integrates these changes. > Thanks. >
-- ----------------------------------------------------------- | Paolo Valente | | | Algogroup | | | Dip. Ing. Informazione | tel: +39 059 2056318 | | Via Vignolese 905/b | fax: +39 059 2056129 | | 41125 Modena - Italy | | | home: http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/ | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |