lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] checkpatch: debugfs_remove() can take NULL
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:20:18AM +0200, Constantine Shulyupin wrote:
> From: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
>
> debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive() can take a NULL, so let's check and warn about that.
>
> Changes since v3, as Joe Perches suggested:
> - removed redundant check
>
> Changes since v2, as Joe Perches suggested:
> - match whitespace around argument
>
> Changes since v1, as Joe Perches suggested:
> - added debugfs_remove_recursive
> - all tests for patterns are "if (a) xxx(a)" are consolidated
>
> Signed-off-by: Constantine Shulyupin <const@MakeLinux.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index f18750e..76ad9f2 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -3213,21 +3213,25 @@ sub process {
> $herecurr);
> }
>
> +# check for needless "if (<foo>) fn(<foo>)" uses
> + if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(\s*($Lval)\s*\)/) {
> + my $expr = '\s*\(\s*' . quotemeta($1) . '\s*\)\s*;';
> +
> # check for needless kfree() checks
> - if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(([^\)]*)\)/) {
> - my $expr = $1;
> - if ($line =~ /\bkfree\(\Q$expr\E\);/) {
> + if ($line =~ /\bkfree$expr/) {
> WARN("NEEDLESS_KFREE",
> "kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
> }
> - }
> # check for needless usb_free_urb() checks
> - if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(([^\)]*)\)/) {
> - my $expr = $1;
> - if ($line =~ /\busb_free_urb\(\Q$expr\E\);/) {
> + if ($line =~ /\busb_free_urb$expr/) {
> WARN("NEEDLESS_USB_FREE_URB",
> "usb_free_urb(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
> }
> +# check for needless debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive*() checks
> + if ($line =~ /\b(debugfs_remove(?:_recursive)?)$expr/) {
> + WARN("NEEDLESS_DEBUGFS_REMOVE",
> + "$1(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
> + }
> }
>
> # prefer usleep_range over udelay

This all looks sensible, though we still have three blocks doing the
same thing. How about we standardise this check into a single check,
generating the capacity from the matched name.

Something like the below on top of V4.

-apw

From 676ce396a349f2242f80e9b2c5fb68584ec09f14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 14:27:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: consolidate if (foo) bar(NULL) checks

Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 313617b..6660246 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -3229,19 +3229,16 @@ sub process {
my $expr = '\s*\(\s*' . quotemeta($1) . '\s*\)\s*;';

# check for needless kfree() checks
- if ($line =~ /\bkfree$expr/) {
- WARN("NEEDLESS_KFREE",
- "kfree(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
- }
# check for needless usb_free_urb() checks
- if ($line =~ /\busb_free_urb$expr/) {
- WARN("NEEDLESS_USB_FREE_URB",
- "usb_free_urb(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
- }
# check for needless debugfs_remove() and debugfs_remove_recursive*() checks
- if ($line =~ /\b(debugfs_remove(?:_recursive)?)$expr/) {
- WARN("NEEDLESS_DEBUGFS_REMOVE",
- "$1(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
+ if ($line =~ /\b(kfree|usb_free_urb|debugfs_remove(?:_recursive)?)$expr/) {
+ my $func = $1;
+ my $func_capacity = "NEEDLESS_$1";
+
+ $func_capacity =~ s/(.$)/\U$1\E/;
+
+ WARN($func_capacity,
+ "$func(NULL) is safe this check is probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
}
}

--
1.7.10.4


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-20 16:01    [W:0.097 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site