[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:57:38PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 17:54 +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > ? That's the message generated by the Windows access control mechanism
> > when you run a binary that requests elevated privileges.
> So that's a windows attack vector using a windows binary? I can't really
> see how it's relevant to the secure boot discussion then.

A user runs a binary that elevates itself to admin. Absent any flaws in
Windows (cough), that should be all it can do in a Secure Boot world.
But if you can drop a small trusted Linux system in there and use that
to boot a compromised Windows kernel, it can make itself persistent.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-02 19:21    [W:0.151 / U:1.812 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site