lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:55:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:37:42 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while you're
> > away. That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will make it easier
> > for others to integrate and test the four(!) different
> > autoschednumacore implementations on top of linux-next.
> >
> > Pretty please?
>
> So, your understanding is that the "old sched/numa code" won't (and
> shouldn't) be merged into Linus' tree (for v3.7, or ever)?
>
> In that case, what I can do is give you a tree that is the same as
> akpm-base but with one of the merges in the tip tree reverted (and, in
> fact, I could push that into akpm-base to make things easier for you).
> I guess that would be the merge of the numa/core branch which would
> result in the following commits being reverted:

Ok, ignore all this :-(

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-14 09:21    [W:0.083 / U:0.720 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site