Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:03:08 +1100 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14 |
| |
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:55:28 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:37:42 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while you're > > away. That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will make it easier > > for others to integrate and test the four(!) different > > autoschednumacore implementations on top of linux-next. > > > > Pretty please? > > So, your understanding is that the "old sched/numa code" won't (and > shouldn't) be merged into Linus' tree (for v3.7, or ever)? > > In that case, what I can do is give you a tree that is the same as > akpm-base but with one of the merges in the tip tree reverted (and, in > fact, I could push that into akpm-base to make things easier for you). > I guess that would be the merge of the numa/core branch which would > result in the following commits being reverted:
Ok, ignore all this :-(
-- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |