lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 3/7] fs, notify: Add file handle entry into inotify_inode_mark
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:40:01PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:20:57 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Whoa. This adds 128+8 bytes to the inotify_inode_mark. That's a lot of
> > > bloat, and there can be a lot of inotify_inode_mark's in the system?
> >
> > Yes, that's why it's not turned on by default, only if is c/r turned on.
> > iirc I've been said that usually only about 40 bytes is used (in the tests
> > I met only 8 bytes). Letme re-check all things.
>
> The question is, how many `struct inotify_inode_mark's are instantiated
> system-wide? Could be millions?

Well, hard to tell, to be fair. On my testing machine only apache has been
using inotify system as far as I remember, but for sure nothing except memory
limit the number of inotify. But I think if one running machine with millions
of inotify it's rather powerful machine with enough memory.

> Dumb question: do we really need inotify_inode_mark.fhandle at all?
> What prevents us from assembling this info on demand when ->show_fdinfo() is
> called?

exportfs requires the dentry to be passed as an argument while inotify works
with inodes instead and at moment of show-fdinfo the target dentry might be
already deleted but inode yet present as far as I remember.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-13 09:41    [W:0.317 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site