lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/8] sparc64: Eliminate PTE table memory wastage.
On 10/4/2012 2:23 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:00:48 +0530
>
>> David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:
>>
>>> We've split up the PTE tables so that they take up half a page instead
>>> of a full page. This is in order to facilitate transparent huge page
>>> support, which works much better if our PMDs cover 4MB instead of 8MB.
>>>
>>> What we do is have a one-behind cache for PTE table allocations in the
>>> mm struct.
>>>
>>> This logic triggers only on allocations. For example, we don't try to
>>> keep track of free'd up page table blocks in the style that the s390
>>> port does.
>>
>> I am also implementing a similar change for powerpc. We have a 64K page
>> size, and want to make sure PMD cover 16MB, which is the huge page size
>> supported by the hardware. I was looking at using the s390 logic,
>> considering we have 16 PMDs mapping to same PTE page. Should we look at
>> generalizing the case so that other architectures can start using the
>> same code ?
>
> I think until we have multiple cases we won't know what's common or not.
>
> Each arch has different need. I need to split the page into two pieces
> so my code is simpler, and juse uses page counting to manage alloc/free.
>
> Whereas s390 uses an bitmask to manage page state, and also reclaims
> pgtable pages into a per-mm list on free. I decided not to do that
> and to just let the page allocator do the work.
>
> So I don't think it's appropriate to think about commonization at this
> time, as even the only two cases existing are very non-common :-)

I'll add arch/tile to the list of architectures that would benefit.
We currently allocate PTEs using the page allocator, but by default
we use 64K pages and 16M huge pages, so with 8-byte PTEs that's
just 2K for the page table, so we could fit 32 of them on a page
if we wished. Instead, for the time being, we just waste the space.

--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-09 22:41    [W:0.205 / U:1.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site