lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] proc: don't show nonexistent capabilities
From
2012/10/3 Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>:
> Quoting Andrew Vagin (avagin@openvz.org):
>> Without this patch it is really hard to interpret a bounding set,
>> if CAP_LAST_CAP is unknown for a current kernel.
>>
>> Non-existant capabilities can not be deleted from a bounding set
>> with help of prctl.
>>
>> E.g.: Here are two examples without/with this patch.
>> CapBnd: ffffffe0fdecffff
>> CapBnd: 00000000fdecffff
>>
>> I suggest to hide non-existent capabilities. Here is two reasons.
>> * It's logically and easier for using.
>> * It helps to checkpoint-restore capabilities of tasks, because tasks
>> can be restored on another kernel, where CAP_LAST_CAP is bigger.
>>
>> Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
>
> Hm, I don't object to this patch. Sounds useful indeed. I can't
> help shake the feeling though that something somewhere will get
> confused by this (though it shouldn't), so I'd like to do some
> testing. Have you run ltp against this? Are you running this
> daily with your distro?

I've been using a kernel with this patch on my workstation (FC17) for two days.
The same kernel works on a test server (RHEL6).

I've executed LTP on the kernel with this patch and without it and the
results are not differ.
The results for both kernels are attached.

Thanks.

>
>> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
>> ---
>> include/linux/capability.h | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/capability.h b/include/linux/capability.h
>> index d10b7ed..1642778 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/capability.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/capability.h
>> @@ -420,7 +420,8 @@ extern const kernel_cap_t __cap_init_eff_set;
>> #else /* HAND-CODED capability initializers */
>>
>> # define CAP_EMPTY_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ 0, 0 }})
>> -# define CAP_FULL_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ ~0, ~0 }})
>> +# define CAP_FULL_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ ~0, \
>> + CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_LAST_CAP + 1) - 1 } })
>> # define CAP_FS_SET ((kernel_cap_t){{ CAP_FS_MASK_B0 \
>> | CAP_TO_MASK(CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE), \
>> CAP_FS_MASK_B1 } })
>> --
>> 1.7.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[unhandled content-type:application/x-gzip][unhandled content-type:application/x-gzip]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-05 00:21    [W:0.103 / U:2.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site