lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/6] ARM: davinci: da850-dm646x: remove the SRAM_VIRT iotable entry
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:23:34PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On 10/3/2012 8:25 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > From: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
> >
> > The sram regions defined for da850-dm646x in their iotable entries are also
> > defined in their davinci_soc_info's.
> >
> > Remove this duplicate information which is now uneccessary since sram
> > init will ioremap the regions defined by their davinci_soc_info's.
> >
> > Since this removal completely removes all uses of SRAM_VIRT, also remove
> > the SRAM_VIRT definition.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardiner@nanometrics.ca>
> > Tested-by: Matt Porter <mporter@ti.com>
>
> What testing was done with this patch? Can you please add that
> information to the commit text as well.

I have only tested on AM180x with uio_pruss and davinci-pcm (series
for that posted a short while ago). In the uio_pruss case, I run the
sample applications from the userspace PRU package that test
communication with the shared SRAM, DDR, and internal PRU SRAM. For
davinci-pcm, my series enables shared SRAM ping-pong buffering which is
working comparably to pcm capture/playback without ping-pong buffering
enabled on AM180x.

I have not tested PM at all...yet.

I'll add this detail to the commit.

-Matt


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-04 17:01    [W:0.154 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site