lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
    On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:44:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
    > > That does still leave me a little uneasy as far as the microcode
    > > licenses go. I don't know that we can distribute signed copies of some
    > > of them, and we obviously can't sign at the user end.
    >
    > You seem to put them in signed rpm packages ?

    That's not a modification of the files that say "You have permission to
    distribute unmodified versions of this file". If a lawyer says this is
    fine, I'm happy.

    --
    Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-10-31 19:21    [W:4.132 / U:0.008 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site