Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 18:17:12 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] irq_work: A couple fixes | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> |
| |
2012/10/30 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>: > On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 17:25 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > >> No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync() > > That one is fine too, as this is the purpose of cpu_relax(). Not only to > relax the cpu, but also to tell gcc that the loop needs to be reread.
Ok, should be fine then.
Thanks!
| |