lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] irq_work: A couple fixes
From
Date
On Tue, 2012-10-30 at 17:25 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> No I was worried about the cpu_relax() in irq_work_sync()

That one is fine too, as this is the purpose of cpu_relax(). Not only to
relax the cpu, but also to tell gcc that the loop needs to be reread.

-- Steve




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-30 18:41    [W:0.232 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site