lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/31] numa/core patches

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:20:32 +0000 Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:

> ...

Useful testing - thanks. Did I miss the description of what
autonumabench actually does? How representitive is it of real-world
things?

> I also expect autonuma is continually scanning where as schednuma is
> reacting to some other external event or at least less frequently scanning.

Might this imply that autonuma is consuming more CPU in kernel threads,
the cost of which didn't get included in these results?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-30 17:01    [W:0.698 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site