Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:18:03 +0530 | From | Laxman Dewangan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: Convert tps6586x to irq_domain |
| |
Hi Mark/Samuel, There is one more change for doing cleanups in regulator parsing where I moved the regulator parsing from mfd to regulator driver: [PATCH] mfd: tps6586x: move regulator dt parsing to regulator driver
Although this series and above change is independent but I like to go these in same branch to avoid the merge conflict.
If this is fine to go in same branch theb I can create a new series of these 3 changes and above change. These series is already reviewed by Mark.
Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks, Laxman
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:10 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:34:47AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > >> The bit definitions are also different in status and mask register >> and yes, this will be again problem as we do in isr thread >> data->status_buf[i]&= ~data->mask_buf[i]; >> So given the constraint, generic will not work here. > OK, that's a good reason not to use the generic code.
| |