Messages in this thread | | | From | Mike Turquette <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] dt: describe base reset signal binding | Date | Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:32:33 -0700 |
| |
Quoting Stephen Warren (2012-10-23 14:45:56) > What do people think of this? Does it sound like a good idea to go ahead > with a reset subsystem? Should we simply add a new API to the common clock > subsystem instead (and assume that reset and clock domains match 1:1). > Should this be implemented as part of the generic power management domains; > see include/linux/pm_domain.h instead? >
Hi Stephen,
I'm not sure a "reset subsystem" is necessary, but I also do not like using clocks as the keys for IP reset. I think it is more common to map IPs to struct device, no?
And of course for clocks shared by multiple users this will not scale.
Regards, Mike
| |