lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2] Input: omap4-keypad: Add pinctrl support
Perhaps I misunderstood what you were suggesting.  I thought that, when
you said "explicitly manage all their resources", you meant that the
driver should know the platform-specific details about clocks and power
domains. That is one possible interpretation of the word "explicit".

Now I see that you meant that the driver should explicitly call
abstracted functions.


On 10/23/2012 7:20 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> HI,
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 07:02:09AM -1000, Mitch Bradley wrote:
>> On 10/23/2012 12:03 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I much prefer having drivers explicitly manage all their resources,
>>> which would mean that pinctrl calls need to be done on probe() and, if
>>> necessary, during suspend()/resume().
>>
>>
>> Per-driver resource management is certainly convenient when you are
>> dealing with a single system, but it becomes difficult to maintain for
>> drivers that are shared among many platforms.
>
> why ? look at drivers/usb/dwc3/, we're using that on OMAP, exynos, PCIe
> and a couple of different FPGA implementations inside TI. Not to mention
> what other licensees of that IP core might have internally.
>
> So far no problesm with resources at all.
>
> We have frameworks exactly to hide the differences.
>
>> The industry trend for many years has been consolidation around a single
>> programming model per class of device. For example, SDHCI, EHCI, ATA.
>> This trend will only accelerate, as the cost of developing controller IP
>> and associated drivers increases. Such drivers need to be as
>> platform-agnostic as possible.
>
> that's why we have pinctrl framework to abstract the details about pin
> muxing.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-23 20:21    [W:0.152 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site