Messages in this thread | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] zynq: move static peripheral mappings | Date | Tue, 23 Oct 2012 17:48:33 +0000 |
| |
On Tuesday 23 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:50:11PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Monday 22 October 2012, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h > > > index d0d3f8f..ae3b236 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h > > > -#define TTC0_PHYS 0xF8001000 > > > -#define TTC0_VIRT TTC0_PHYS > > > +#define TTC0_PHYS 0xF8001000 > > > +#define TTC0_SIZE SZ_4K > > > +#define TTC0_VIRT (UART0_VIRT - TTC0_SIZE) > > > > It's quite likely that this does not have to be a fixed mapping > > any more. Just have a look at how drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c > > calls of_iomap() to get the address. > > Yes, this is already on my list of plans. The in-tree TTC driver > unfortunately doesn't yet support device tree bindings. Are you > comfortable waiting on the DT-ification of the TTC in a follow-up > patchset?
Yes, that's fine. If you do that, you can also move the driver to drivers/clocksource in another patch.
Arnd
| |