lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: dw_dmac: use helper macro module_platform_driver()
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:42:00PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:52:40PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:21:04PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:08 PM, viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Andy Shevchenko
> > >> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >> >> On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 14:41 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >> >>> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Since v3.2 we have nice macro to define the platform driver's init and exit
> > >> >>> calls. This patch simplifies the dw_dmac driver by using that macro.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Actually we can't do this. It will break initialization of some other
> > >> >> drivers.
> > >> >
> > >> > why?
> > >>
> > >> We have spi, i2c and hsuart devices connected to the DMA controller.
> > >> In case we would like to use DMA we have to have the dw_dmac loaded
> > >> before them. Currently we have spi driver on subsys_initcall level,
> > >> and Mika, who is developing it, will change to module_init_call level.
> > >> However, it will just hide the potential issue. He also tried to use
> > >> deferred module loading, but we don't know if it's good solution or
> > >> not, and that solution requires something to stop deferring at some
> > >> moment.
> > >>
> > >> Might be we missed something and there is a better solution.
> > >
> > > if they can only work with DMA, they should return -EPROBE_DEFER so
> > > their probe() function can be called after DMA driver has finished
> > > probing.
> >
> > They could work either with DMA or via PIO mode.
> > How does the driver know when to stop to return -EPROBE_DEFER?
>
> Why would you even allow to work as PIO-only ? Who would even want to
> use the driver as PIO only ?

Think about SPI or I2C, if we don't have DMA available we are still able to
use the driver (and the bus) instead of just failing.

> In any case, you can add a Kconfig choice like WHATEVER_PIO_ONLY and
> only return -EPROBE_DEFER ifndef WHATEVER_PIO_ONLY.

Why would we add more Kconfig options for things that can be checked
runtime? Distro makers need to select that option anyway so it doesn't gain
anything, except confuses users.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-11 08:01    [W:0.042 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site