Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] scheduler: domain: init next_balance in nohz_idle_balancer with jiffies | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:44:44 +0100 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 14:44 +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > From: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com> > > The next_balance parameter of nohz_idle_balancer should be initialized > to jiffies since jiffies itself is initialized to 300 seconds shy of > overflow. Otherwise, nohz_idle_balancer does not run for the first 5 > mins after bootup. > > Signed-off-by: Diwakar Tundlam <dtundlam@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Frid <afrid@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Peter Boonstoppel <pboonstoppel@nvidia.com> > Reviewed-by: Satya Popuri <spopuri@nvidia.com> > --- > kernel/sched.c | 1 + > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
You'll find that this file no longer exists...
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c > index b5efd6c..d3f291f 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched.c > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > @@ -8383,6 +8383,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void) > atomic_set(&nohz.load_balancer, nr_cpu_ids); > atomic_set(&nohz.first_pick_cpu, nr_cpu_ids); > atomic_set(&nohz.second_pick_cpu, nr_cpu_ids); > + nohz.next_balance = jiffies; > #endif > /* May be allocated at isolcpus cmdline parse time */ > if (cpu_isolated_map == NULL)
Not does this code section..
| |