Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:10:43 +0800 | From | Shawn Guo <> | Subject | Re: Pinmux bindings proposal V2 |
| |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: ... > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate, > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states. > It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases that require mux change for different configuration states?
-- Regards, Shawn
| |