lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Pinmux bindings proposal V2
    On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:16:53AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
    ...
    > I guess the analog we should follow here is clk_get and clk_set_rate,
    > except we would have pinconf_set_state with predefined states.
    >
    It seems working for cases that we only change pinconf but never pinmux
    for different configuration states. But how would that work for cases
    that require mux change for different configuration states?

    --
    Regards,
    Shawn


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-30 03:01    [W:2.671 / U:0.028 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site