lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef
From
Date
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 17:47 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:

> > Isn't 'struct seccomp_struct' a bit redundant?
> >
> > How about a simple 'struct seccomp' instead?
>
> Works for me - I can't recall why that seemed to make sense (other
> than the user of similar redundant names elsewhere).
>

You mean like... struct task_struct?

;-)

-- Steve




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-28 01:41    [W:0.051 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site