Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef
From
Steven Rostedt <>
Date
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:38:36 -0500
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 17:47 -0600, Will Drewry wrote:
> > Isn't 'struct seccomp_struct' a bit redundant? > > > > How about a simple 'struct seccomp' instead? > > Works for me - I can't recall why that seemed to make sense (other > than the user of similar redundant names elsewhere). >