lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: Ioctl warning for a partition
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> It's easy enough to silence the warning the same way as
> CDROM_GET_CAPABILITY since the ioctl is safe but it's not so simple for
> 32-bit userspace.  MTIOCGET32 is defined only in fs/compat_ioctl.c so we
> cannot easily add it to scsi_verify_blk_ioctl(). Any opinion how to cleanly
> solve this? The only idea I had was to define compat structures and ioctl
> numbers in a special header and use it both in fs/compat_ioctl.c and in
> block/scsi_ioctl.c.

I suspect we can just remove the warning entirely - once we've gotten
enough coverage with the -rc kernels that people (me in particular)
are happy that no normal load really needs it, and returning an error
is fine.

So I don't really consider the warning to be something long-term - I
wanted it to make sure that some random binary in some odd
distribution wouldn't break in mysterious ways that would take a lot
of debugging to find. And so that we really know what we end up
blocking in practice.

I'm not sure how good the -rc kernel coverage is, but I think it's
good enough that we can drop the warning before doing a real 3.3
release. And I don't think the stable kernel versions ever got that
warning printout, did they? That would be great for coverage, of
course, if they did.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-27 00:03    [W:1.083 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site