Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:04:04 +0100 (CET) | From | Jesper Juhl <> | Subject | Re: [000/129] 3.2.2-stable review |
| |
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:47:08PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > #include <stable/formletter.h> > > > #define RELEASE 3.2.2-rc1 > > > #define NUM_PATCHES 129 > > > #define RESPONSE_DATE "Wed, Jan 25, 2012 20:00:00 +0000" > > > #define LOCATION kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.2.2-rc1.gz > > > > A very small, seriously not at all important, tiny question; Why are the > > patches for 3.2.x placed in /pub/linux/kernel/v3.**0**/ ??? > > It's a symlink, why not? :) > Just seems confusing, that's all.. After all, 3.2.x is not 3.0.x, so it looks like an error... Not at all important, that's just the impression I got..
-- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.
| |