Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2012 22:44:32 +0100 (CET) | From | Jesper Juhl <> | Subject | Re: [000/129] 3.2.2-stable review |
| |
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:19:36AM +0200, Igor Grinberg wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > On 01/24/12 04:40, Greg KH wrote: > > > #include <stable/formletter.h> > > > #define RELEASE 3.2.2-rc1 > > > #define NUM_PATCHES 129 > > > #define RESPONSE_DATE "Wed, Jan 25, 2012 20:00:00 +0000" > > > #define LOCATION kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.2.2-rc1.gz > > > > > > diffstat below, no one really reads these things anyway... > > > > This is not exactly true... > > I'm (and I think I'm not the only one) going through the diffstat > > to see if there are any files of my interest involved, > > because it is not always straight forward to understand what > > the patch subject means and also there are too many of them to read all... > > So, for me, the compromise between being updated on important issues > > and spend not too much time reading patches subjects/message is > > read the diffstat and if I find anything that is of my interest, > > then go to the patches... > > May be not the best, but works for me... > > Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that no one reads the diffstat, I ment the > other generic wording that I've had in the announcement emails for the > past 6 years. > > Glad it's still useful for you. > I find it useful as well..
-- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.
| |