Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:35:19 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: mfd regmap irq to handle some cases |
| |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 04:28:29AM +0000, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> > > There will processing of false events which is undesirable.
> > But what actually happens? RTC interrupts aren't going to be high > > volume, if we get the odd spurious interrupt and handle it gracefully > > I'm not sure we really care.
> spurious interrupt we get on clearing event and event can be from any > mfd children. But since now, deferring event clear is not the approach > we can ignore about the spurious interrupt. > Now looking at the old issue of determining the RTC type (periodic or tick) > on event clearing this info (RTC type) gets lost for the register since in regmap_irq > we first clear and then process the event.
That we can handle easily enough by adding a flag to the interrupt definition deferring the acknowledgement.
| |