lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] If init dies, log a signal which killed it, if any.
On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:17:16 +0100
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> wrote:

> I just received another user's pleas for help when their
> init mysteriously died. I again explained that they need to check
> whether it died because of bad instruction, a segv, or something else.
> Which was an annoying detour into writing a trivial C program
> to spawn his init and print its exit code:
>
> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2012-January/077172.html
>
> I hear you saying "just test it under /bin/sh". Well, the crashing init
> _was_ /bin/sh.
>
> Which prompted me to make kernel do this first step automatically.
> We can print exit code, which makes it possible to see that
> death was from e.g. SIGILL without writing test programs.
>
> The code is fairly self-explanatory. Compile-tested.
>
> Changes in v.2: don't try to decode signal names, just print
> exit status in hex.
>
>
> ...
>
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -710,8 +710,11 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reaper(struct task_struct *father)
>
> if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) {
> write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> - if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns))
> - panic("Attempted to kill init!");
> + if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) {
> + panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=%08x\n",
> + father->signal->group_exit_code ?:
> + father->exit_code);
> + }

It's a bit user-hostile to print a hex number in such a context without
the leading 0x. The %08 does provide a hint - users are unlikely to
interpret 00000011 as 11. But still, I think...

--- a/kernel/exit.c~kernel-exitc-if-init-dies-log-a-signal-which-killed-it-if-any-fix
+++ a/kernel/exit.c
@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reap
if (unlikely(pid_ns->child_reaper == father)) {
write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
if (unlikely(pid_ns == &init_pid_ns)) {
- panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=%08x\n",
+ panic("Attempted to kill init! exitcode=0x%08x\n",
father->signal->group_exit_code ?:
father->exit_code);
}
_
Or maybe we should use %d. Does anyone use hex for exit codes?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-25 01:23    [W:1.014 / U:0.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site