lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 3.2.0-07927-gc49c41a: s2ram: Device 'machinecheck1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed
> But the only reason I haven't really jumped into writing such a patch
> is that I would prefer to get the semantics right - adding a dummy
> function is IMO something like working around the rules of the driver-core
> framework just to silence the warning. Hence I feel we should resort
> to it _only_ if there is nothing better we can do about this.

Ah, I see. Will ignore the warning.
Thanks for the detailed explanation!

Sorry for the noise.

--

Sergei
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-16 12:37    [W:0.048 / U:1.568 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site