Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:52:59 -0600 | Subject | Re: [RFC,PATCH 1/2] seccomp_filters: system call filtering using BPF | From | Will Drewry <> |
| |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote: >> more about). Since setuid is privilege escalation, then perhaps it >> makes sense to allow it as an escape hatch. >> >> Would it be sane to just disallow setuid exec exclusively? > > I think that is a policy question. I can imagine cases where either > behaviour is the "right" one so it may need to be a parameter ?
Makes sense. I'll make it flaggable (ignoring the parallel conversation about having a thread-wide suidable bit).
thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |