Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Jan 2012 21:05:15 +0800 | From | Shawn Guo <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings |
| |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote: > Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name > property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name.
I do not see the necessity.
> If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names. > If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from > the node name.
To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose.
-- Regards, Shawn
| |