| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 12/26] Uprobes: Handle breakpoint and Singlestep | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:59:13 +0200 |
| |
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 17:32 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > Hence provide some extra > + * time (by way of synchronize_sched() for breakpoint hit threads to acquire > + * the uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree.
'Some extra time' doesn't make me all warm an fuzzy inside, but instead screams we fudge around a race condition.
ISTR raising this before ;-)
|