Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- "Luck, Tony"
- Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ...
| | | From | "Luck, Tony" <> | Date | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:54:48 -0700 | Subject | RE: [PATCH 0/5] Yet another pass at machine check recovery |
| |
> Two slightly different versions showed up here almost on top of each other. > Which one should we be looking at? Or do you want us to ignore both and you do > another one with REPOST in the subject?
My script that added "in-reply-to" parts 1-5 to make them thread from part 0 got a little over-enthusiastic and started recursing on its own output.
The second version is identical (patchwise) to the first - it just has a bogus "From: "Luck, Tony" line added.
I don't think I need to clutter the list with a repost.
Sorry for the noise and confusion - the bad script has been told to go sit in the corner with a paper bag on its head.
-Tony
| |