lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Aug]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
    > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one
    > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original
    > patchset is consistently performing much better :)

    It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to
    assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-08-26 15:21    [W:8.490 / U:0.116 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site