Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:18:21 +0200 |
| |
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original > patchset is consistently performing much better :)
It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!
| |