| Subject | Re: [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI | From | Artem Bityutskiy <> | Date | Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:42:13 +0300 |
| |
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:17 +0200, david.wagner@free-electrons.com wrote: > Questions: > ========== > I wasn't sure what magic ioctl number to use, so I settled to use the same one > as a part of UBI: 'O', which was so far only used by UBI but on a higher range > and leaving some room for UBI to add ioctls (for nw, it uses 'O'/0x00-0x06 and > ubiblk uses 'O'/0x10-0x11). Is it ok or should ubiblk use a different > number/range ?
I think this is OK to share them between UBI and ubiblk, as long as this is documented. But I always CC Arnd when it comes to ioctl-related questions.
P.S. Arnd, you can always find the initial post in lkml, if needed.
-- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
|