Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:03:07 +0200 | From | Marco Stornelli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs: add SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags |
| |
Il 20/08/2011 11:41, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: > Hi, > > Il 28/06/2011 17:33, Josef Bacik ha scritto: >> This just gets us ready to support the SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA flags. >> Turns out >> using fiemap in things like cp cause more problems than it solves, so >> lets try >> and give userspace an interface that doesn't suck. We need to match >> solaris >> here, and the definitions are >> >> *o* If /whence/ is SEEK_HOLE, the offset of the start of the >> next hole greater than or equal to the supplied offset >> is returned. The definition of a hole is provided near >> the end of the DESCRIPTION. >> >> *o* If /whence/ is SEEK_DATA, the file pointer is set to the >> start of the next non-hole file region greater than or >> equal to the supplied offset. >> > > I'm implementing the SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE management for pramfs and I've > got some doubts about the right behavior: > > 1) when we use SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE, the offset used in lseek means > always the offset from the start of the file, right? > > 2) in case of a file with hole at the beginning and data at the end, if > I do lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_HOLE) I should receive the end of the file > because the idea is to search the *next* hole and we have always a > virtual hole at the end of the file, right?
Just to be precise about this question: the alternative here, it's to return the same position because we are already in a hole.
Marco
| |