Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:47:02 +0200 | From | Stefan Richter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] scsi: Document generic scsi device attributes |
| |
On Aug 17 James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:00 -0500, scameron@beardog.cce.hp.com wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:45:06PM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:20 -0500, Stephen M. Cameron wrote: > > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-scsi_devices > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@ > > > > +What: /sys/class/scsi_device/..../device/device_blocked > > > > +Date: December, 2002 > > > > +KernelVersion: Unknown > > > > +Contact: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> > > > > > > Hmm, so I get fingered for every screw up in our sysfs ABI? nice wide > > > receiver buck pass move. > > > > Uh, sorry if that wasn't the right thing to do, which it sounds > > like it wasn't. I just put your name there because you're the SCSI > > maintainer. I can dig through all the commits and see who added what > > if that's preferable. Or leave the names out? or something else? > > No, don't worry, the patch is the right thing to do ... I was just > slightly amused to see my name down for all of it.
Isn't linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org acceptable if not even preferable as contact? -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-== =--- =--=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/
| |