Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 21 Aug 2011 18:51:37 +0430 | From | Ali Gholami Rudi <> | Subject | Re: missing acpi backlight bisected to 9661e92c10 |
| |
Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> wrote: > Well, that all looks fine. And I also can't see any way that this commit > could cause the backlight not to appear - all it does is set the parent > if it's present. There's no new path that could cause it to return > early. Does reverting this patch really make things work?
Yes. I'm running the patched kernel right now.
I can apply a debug patch on the unchanged kernel, if it helps?
Ali
| |