lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [patch v2] x86: kvm: x86: fix information leak to userland
From
Date

On 26.07.2011, at 19:24, Avi Kivity wrote:

> On 07/26/2011 08:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> struct kvm_pit_state2 {
>> struct kvm_pit_channel_state channels[3];
>> __u32 flags;
>> __u32 reserved[9];
>> };
>>
>> So memset(&ps->reserved) would give you the a __u32 **, no? Same goes for all the other array sets in here. Or am I understanding some C logic wrong? :)
>>
>
> An address of an array is the array itself.

Ah, nice. So it's really a matter of taste then rather than functionality. Good to know :)


Alex



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-26 19:41    [W:0.044 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site