lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Jul]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code
From
Hi,

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> wrote:
> On 2011-07-26 06:49, Ming Lei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The bug is observed in -next-20110725, follows the stack trace[1], and
>> seems the attachment patch can fix the bug.
>
> Does this work, too? We don't necessarily need the CPU stable, but
> spewing debug output isn't very nice.

This does work, thanks,

> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index f8cb099..f925581 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ get_rq:
>
>        if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) ||
>            bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CPU_AFFINE))
> -               req->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +               req->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
>        plug = current->plug;
>        if (plug) {
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
>


thanks,
--
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-07-26 08:25    [W:0.039 / U:1.312 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site