Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:53:37 -0300 | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> | Subject | Re: Funny perf |
| |
Em Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu: > On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 19:26 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > so this looks like some of the samples do not belong in the perf.data > > output with that garbled cpu field. It lets me also assume that the > > sample->time field is also crap so the timestamp check is falsely > > tripped. > > Most interesting, I haven't tried to reproduce, but it does sound > smelly. > > I did have a quick peek at some code I suspected but that all seems in > order. I guess someone will have to sit down and figure this out proper, > if nobody steps up I guess it'll have to be me, but that also means it > might take a while since I've got some other pending stuff to stare at > before this :/
I'll look at it today.
- Arnaldo
| |