lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[094/115] sched: Do not consider SCHED_IDLE tasks to be cache hot
2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

Commit: ef8002f6848236de5adc613063ebeabddea8a6fb upstream

This patch adds a check in task_hot to return if the task has SCHED_IDLE
policy. SCHED_IDLE tasks have very low weight, and when run with regular
workloads, are typically scheduled many milliseconds apart. There is no
need to consider these tasks hot for load balancing.

Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <1287173550-30365-2-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
kernel/sched.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2014,6 +2014,9 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now,
if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
return 0;

+ if (unlikely(p->policy == SCHED_IDLE))
+ return 0;
+
/*
* Buddy candidates are cache hot:
*/



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-16 02:59    [W:0.357 / U:0.192 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site