Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Feb 2011 10:11:03 +0100 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration |
| |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:35:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > On 02/14/2011 11:30 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:07:02AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > >> Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip. > > > > Alright, fair enough. > > > >> BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master. > > > > Yeah, I saw a new patch going into the numa branch, but shouldn't this > > and the next series based on x86/numa? That was how it was done with > > the previous series. > > there is patch about init_memory_mapping_high() in tip/x86/bootmem. > it will put pgtable on local nodes.
Ingo, hpa, how do you guys want to handle this? Maybe you can cherry pick or pull the branch into x86/numa?
Thanks.
-- tejun
| |