lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:54 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
>
> > I don't need an atomic_read() in the disabled case for dynamic debug,
> > and I would be ok, #ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL, in dynamic_debug.h. Its not
> > the prettiest solution. But I can certainly live with it for now, so
> > that we can sort out the atomic_read() issue independently.
> >
> > Peter, Mathieu, are you guys ok with this?
>
> Yeah, lets see where that gets us.
>

Works for me as long as you put a nice witty comment around this
disgusting hack (something related to "include Hell", where bad
programmers go after they die). ;-)

Thanks,

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-14 20:51    [W:0.086 / U:0.736 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site