Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:48:20 -0500 | From | Mathieu Desnoyers <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@infradead.org) wrote: > On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:54 -0500, Jason Baron wrote: > > > I don't need an atomic_read() in the disabled case for dynamic debug, > > and I would be ok, #ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL, in dynamic_debug.h. Its not > > the prettiest solution. But I can certainly live with it for now, so > > that we can sort out the atomic_read() issue independently. > > > > Peter, Mathieu, are you guys ok with this? > > Yeah, lets see where that gets us. >
Works for me as long as you put a nice witty comment around this disgusting hack (something related to "include Hell", where bad programmers go after they die). ;-)
Thanks,
Mathieu
-- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
| |